Learn More FACTS.

ABOUT HOUSE BILL 2234 / THE ILLINOIS RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROTECTION AND CIVIL UNION ACT. Many people do not know that ...

The production, distribution, exchange, consumption form, thus the correct syllogism: the production of its universality, distribution and exchange - features, and consumption - individuality, trailing a whole. This, of course, the link, but superficial. Production [in accordance with Economic Policy] defines the universal laws of nature, the distribution - the public a chance, and its impact on production can therefore be either more favorable or less favorable, the exchange is between both of them formally as a social movement, and the final act-consumption, considered not only as a destination, but also as the ultimate goal - is, strictly speaking, outside of political economy, except that it will, in turn, had the reverse effect on the starting point and once again gives rise to the process.

Opponents of the political economists - whether the opponents of the environment most of the science or not, - reproach Economic Policy in barbarian tearing apart a whole, or stand with them in the same soil, or below them. There's nothing more trite than a reproach, as though political economists pay too much, the utmost attention to the production, seeing it as an end in itself. The distribution is, they say, just as important. The basis of this reproach is just a representation of political economists, though the distribution exists as a separate, independent sphere close to production. Or Economic Policy makes the reproach that, they say, they have these moments are not covered in their unity. As if it tearing a whole in the parts of reality do not penetrate into textbooks, but instead of textbooks - indeed, as if there is a question of dialectical reconciliation of concepts, not about understanding the real relationship!