The further back we went into the history, the more the individual, and hence producing an individual acts as a dependent, belonging to a larger whole: first, yet completely natural manner it is connected with the family and the family that grew in the race and later - with arising from the collision and merging of tribal communities in its various forms. Only in the XVIII century, the "civil society", the various forms of public communication act in relation to the individual as merely a means for its private purposes, as external necessity. However, the era that generates this point of view - the point of view of a separate single - is just the era of the most developed social (from this point of view, general) relations. Man is in the most literal sense *** 1a, not only the animal, which is characteristic of communication, but an animal that only in a society [M-2] and can be apart. Production of isolated single outside society - a rare phenomenon, which, of course, can happen to civilized man, accidentally cast into the wilderness and potentially contained the social forces - the same nonsense as the development of language without a people living together and talking to each other individuals. This can no longer stop. This item could not be affected, if absurd, it is quite understandable for people of XVIII century, were not again seriously brought into the latest political economy of Bastiat, Carey *, Proudhon 14 and so on Proudhon and others, of course, pleased to make history philosophical explanation of the origin or economic relations, the historical occurrence of which he does not know, by creating a myth that Adam or Prometheus The idea came in the final and finished form, and then it was introduced, etc. There is nothing dry and dull than fantasize locus communis.